Cookies on BBB.org

We use cookies to give users the best content and online experience. By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to allow us to use all cookies. Visit our Privacy Policy to learn more.

Manage Cookies
Share
Business Profile

Fire and Water Damage Restoration

Paul Davis Restoration

This business is NOT BBB Accredited.

Find BBB Accredited Businesses in Fire and Water Damage Restoration.

Complaints

This profile includes complaints for Paul Davis Restoration's headquarters and its corporate-owned locations. To view all corporate locations, see

Find a Location

Paul Davis Restoration has 2 locations, listed below.

*This company may be headquartered in or have additional locations in another country. Please click on the country abbreviation in the search box below to change to a different country location.

    Country
    Please enter a valid location.

    Customer Complaints Summary

    • 1 complaint in the last 3 years.
    • 1 complaint closed in the last 12 months.

    If you've experienced an issue

    Submit a Complaint

    The complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.

    Sort by

    Complaint status

    Complaint type

    • Initial Complaint

      Date:07/22/2024

      Type:Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      AnsweredMore info

      Complaint statuses

      Resolved:
      The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
      Unresolved:
      The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
      Answered:
      The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
      Unanswered:
      The business failed to respond to the dispute.
      Unpursuable:
      BBB is unable to locate the business.
      In late March 2024 **** Davis was contacted by my home insurance to estimate restoration of my home caused by water damage. Over the course of the following 3-months the **** Davis estimator submitted and obtained insurance approval for all related repairs. In parallel the PD estimator was onsite several times to discuss changes and additions to the repairs/work (e.g. relocate sink, install window) and that we (homeowners) could source material (e.g. vanity) should PD material/cost be inferior to that of another; all of which was verbally confirmed and enthusiastically committed to (to my wife and me) within the approved estimate, with minimal additional cost ($2700.00). Move forward to early July, **** Davis wanted a signed work order to start but was paused as the work order outlined that no verbal commitments would be honored, only written. We reached back to PD asking for a redline or written commitment to everything that was promised as part of our lengthy review. PD mgmt. shared they would not alter their agreement and have since ignore all subsequent communications. We do currently hold a written communication from the estimator outlining the changes and costs, but appears mgmt. does not want to honor those.What we discovered through this exercise is that **** Davis Tulsa is clearly violating the *** act through unfair and deceptive trade practices ****************

      Business Response

      Date: 08/01/2024

      Attached is **** Davis' response to ****************** complaint. Please reach out and let us know if there are any next steps necessary in resolving this issue.

      Thank you

      Customer Answer

      Date: 08/08/2024

      Within a week following the complaint filed here I received several emails (only) from **** Davis (attached). Within I explained again why I would like to make adjustments to the agreement. The payment penalty terms were resolved as payment was already in-hand with **** Davis from insurance, however **** Davis continuously pressed for a signed work authorization before all items verbally discussed and agreed to (scope and cost) were documented. I asked kindly to have those outlined in advance to ensure they were all captured and aligned to discussions had with their site estimator. *Work authorization outlined that NO VERBAL discussions would be honored, and **** Davis would have complete authority to complete all of the work. 

      While challenging I was hopeful to receive these updates and move forward via a signed work authorization. Moving forward to last week, **** Davis pivoted and severed their relationship with this work once they received your formal BBB complaint inquiry.

      It's evident that **** Davis works with potential clients by providing damage restoration estimates AND may offer scope changes with promises, but inflate related costs after a client signs a work authorization. This bait and switch tactic leads the consumer to: use **** Davis exclusively for the primary scope of work and potentially pay additional fees/costs related to additional/change work discussed during estimate, leaning on the work authorization to drive those additional fees/costs.

      I've attached the work authorization **** Davis asked me to sign before receiving any documented changes and their costs and a separate thread noting their desire to move forward after the redline challenges were addressed.

      No money has been exchanged. **** Davis has also (noted in their response) decided to not work with my wife and me. I'm not looking to force their commitment but remain steadfast that their consumer engagements may consistently involve bait and switch. 

      Customer Answer

      Date: 08/08/2024

      Within a week following the complaint filed here I received several emails (only) from **** Davis (attached). Within I explained again why I would like to make adjustments to the agreement. The payment penalty terms were resolved as payment was already in-hand with **** Davis from insurance, however **** Davis continuously pressed for a signed work authorization before all items verbally discussed and agreed to (scope and cost) were documented. I asked kindly to have those outlined in advance to ensure they were all captured and aligned to discussions had with their site estimator. *Work authorization outlined that NO VERBAL discussions would be honored, and **** Davis would have complete authority to complete all of the work. 
      While challenging I was hopeful to receive these updates and move forward via a signed work authorization. Moving forward to last week, **** Davis pivoted and severed their relationship with this work once they received your formal BBB complaint inquiry.
      It's evident that **** Davis works with potential clients by providing damage restoration estimates AND may offer scope changes with promises but inflate related costs after a client signs a work authorization. This bait and switch tactic leads the consumer to use **** Davis exclusively for the primary scope of work and potentially pay additional fees/costs related to additional/change work discussed during estimate, leaning on the work authorization to drive those additional fees/costs.
      I've attached the work authorization **** Davis asked me to sign before receiving any documented changes and their costs and a separate thread noting their desire to move forward after the redline challenges were addressed.
      No money has been exchanged. **** Davis has also (noted in their response) decided to not work with my wife and me. I'm not looking to force their commitment but remain steadfast that their consumer engagements may consistently involve bait and switch. 

    BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.

    BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.

    When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.

    BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this business, please let the business know that you contacted BBB for a BBB Business Profile.

    As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation. BBB charges a fee for BBB Accreditation. This fee supports BBB's efforts to fulfill its mission of advancing marketplace trust.